Integrates seamlessly into any workflow, including Adobe Photoshop® and Lightroom®ĭeepPRIME XD: cleaner images, more detail No complex sliders or guesswork - DxO PureRAW 3 automatically provides perfect results Lens profiles that deliver sharpening where it’s needed most - not uniformly across the imageĭraw out stunning levels of detail and achieve more accurate colors in low lightĪutomatically eliminate lens flaws, including vignetting, chromatic aberration, and distortion When LR creates a hdr or pano it contains RGB (tif) file like the DXO file.DxO PureRAW Simply better RAW files, Enhance your RAW files to open up even more possibilities with Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom®.ĭxO PureRAW 3 gives you unparalleled noise reduction and industry-leading optical correctionsĪI-powered denoising and demosaicing gives you crisp, clean images, free of noise It can contain mosaic (actual raw) or demosaiced (RGB) data, effectively a 16bit tif file in a DNG container. DXO demosaics the data and creates a linear DNG. I thought 'raw was raw' and that different raw conversion tools simply define how the pixels are drawn when making an image? I probably need to learn more about RAW conversion in general, but I'm wondering if I need to backup both files - or if the 'same' underlying data is present in both the CR3 and the DNG?Ī raw file contains mosaiced data. However, is there a way to use the linear DNG (output from DxO) and 'redo' a raw conversion using Lightroom/ACR (i.e.

I understand that these two raw files appear 'different' when I view them in Lightroom (that's what makes DxO so great!). the CR3 from my Canon R6) after being converted to a linear DNG via DxO PureRaw?

Is there a good reason to keep the original RAW file (i.e.

Pureraw crack